Charlie Penna's "My View," "Is town realizing promised benefits of the Basha
Kill?" (Nov. 10), as well as his later post-election comments, serve as a
catalyst for a long-overdue response to the innuendos, accusations and
falsehoods about the Basha Kill Wildlife Management Area and Basha Kill Area
Association that have been blatantly promoted by the supervisor throughout his tenure.
Notably, since its inception, the Basha Kill WMA's primary aim has been
habitat protection along with sanctioning recreational pursuits that
coincide with this purpose. The wetland was never intended to be a major
tourist attraction like Cape May nor to be the engine driving Mamakating's economy.
Nevertheless, many visitors are annually drawn to this ecosystem,
particularly birders who are influenced by the Basha Kill WMA's prominence
as a state Audubon-designated Very Important Bird Area. Consequently, the
BKAA strives to meet this interest and to convey other aspects of the WMA's
multifaceted dynamics to participants in highly popular educational walks
and in other venues like the well-attended Eagle Watch program, where we
partner with the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the Eagle Institute.
Obviously, the Basha Kill's reputation and appeal far exceed the narrow
constraints of municipal boundaries. Why is it surprising, then, that
numerous supporters of the BKAA's mission, which underscores resource
conservation, reside outside Mamakating or even in other states such as
Pennsylvania or New Jersey, which are nearby? It is absurd for Penna to
imply that there is a furtive motive in our organization accepting financial
assistance from an "out of town" populace when innumerable Basha Kill
aficionados are from "out of town."
Penna further undermines his arguments and enhances their preposterous
nature by suggesting that the BKAA utilizes its money in secretive ways.
Funds certainly are not dispensed to board members, since the BKAA is
managed solely by volunteers. Actually, a percentage of the group's budget
produced a brochure touting the WMA's distinctive qualities, which
undoubtedly prompted increased usage and generated a concomitant "ripple
effect" positively impacting local businesses.
A field guide scheduled for release next year will likewise be a potent
public relations modality. Our group also conducts water testing, sponsors
young people to the DeBruce Environmental Camp, provides a scholarship at
Sullivan County Community College, and filed a lawsuit against the town
Planning Board for failing to take a "hard look" at the environmental
impacts of the proposed mushroom plant on the community. All these
activities and more are rooted in our mission statement. To insinuate that
the BKAA "may be neglecting the Basha Kill itself" cannot be farther from the truth.
Another issue Penna raised is the Basha Kill WMA's contribution to the local
tax base. Because of a 1995 amendment of the Real Property Tax Law, DEC
Basha Kill properties in Mamakating are subject to taxation for all
purposes. According to the Sullivan County Treasurer's Office, the state
paid approximately $19,000 in town, county and special district taxes on its
Basha Kill lands in January.
Finally, though the BKAA fully accepts accountability for our positions
relating to Yukiguni Maitake, Wurtsboro Airport, casinos and Steep Slopes,
we strenuously object to being branded the scapegoat for actions that have
not involved us simply because of our environmental agenda.
"Environmentalist" is a dirty word only to those who believe that terms like
clean air, unpolluted streams and open space also have negative
connotations.
Paula Medley of Westbrookville is president of the Basha Kill Area Association.
www.recordonline.com/archive/2005/12/18/opinion-18views-12-18.html